All Case Studies
Student Recruitment

Making Postgraduate Programs Easier to Discover

A subject-led discovery plan connects prospective students with four specialist master’s programs and a clearer route from research to application.

At a glance

Institution / regionCanadian research university · Canada
Reporting windowApril–September 2026
Focus4 postgraduate programs · South Asia and MENA

Modelled case study. Figures are a coherent planning scenario for editorial review; they are not verified customer results.

Performance snapshot

The six-month picture

A single view of the modelled activity and stage movement for this scenario.

Program-page visits18,420+44% vs comparison window
Qualified enquiries728+36% vs comparison window
Application starts164+28% vs comparison window
Enquiry → application22.5%164 starts ÷ 728 enquiries
01 / Context

The challenge and the opening

The challenge

The university offers specialist master’s degrees with strong academic value, yet prospective students encounter them late in their research. Broad institutional messaging leaves entry requirements, career relevance, and funding difficult to compare.

The opportunity

The team can organize discovery around subject intent and answer the questions students ask before making contact. Clear program pages give each campaign a relevant destination instead of sending every visitor to a general admissions page.

Working objective

Increase qualified program enquiries and application starts across four priority degrees while keeping the admissions team’s follow-up workload manageable.

02 / Strategy

How the approach was structured

Create dedicated program pages with clear entry requirements, study outcomes, scholarship information, and a direct enquiry route. Promote each page to audiences researching related subjects and destinations.

01

Build subject-specific destinations

Give each degree its own page with curriculum, entry requirements, fees, scholarships, and next intake dates.

02

Match messages to intent

Separate engineering, health, policy, and computing audiences so the first message reflects the student’s academic interest.

03

Route enquiries to the right team

Capture program choice and study level before the handoff, then assign an admissions owner for relevant follow-up.

03 / Execution

A practical six-month rollout

01

Weeks 1–2 · Audit

Review existing program pages, common student questions, and the baseline for visits, enquiries, and application starts.

02

Weeks 3–5 · Prepare

Publish four improved program pages and align campaign creative with the information on each page.

03

Months 2–4 · Reach

Run subject-led discovery campaigns; check search terms and enquiry quality every two weeks.

04

Months 5–6 · Refine

Shift effort toward pages with stronger enquiry quality and clarify content where students abandon the journey.

04 / Results model

From activity to meaningful progression

The month-by-month trend and baseline comparison show direction; the stage view shows where student interest narrows.

Monthly trend

Qualified enquiries per month

Qualified enquiries per month, April–September 2026: Apr 82, May 93, Jun 109, Jul 121, Aug 148, Sep 1750113225AprMayJunJulAugSep
Apr82
May93
Jun109
Jul121
Aug148
Sep175

Period comparison

Baseline vs modelled period

Previous windowCurrent model

Program-page visits

+44%
Before
12,800
Current
18,420

Qualified enquiries

+36%
Before
535
Current
728

Application starts

+28%
Before
128
Current
164

Student journey by stage

Each number is a modelled count for the same reporting window.

01
61,200

Campaign reach

Starting audience

02
18,420

Program-page visits

30.1% of previous stage

03
728

Qualified enquiries

4.0% of previous stage

04
164

Application starts

22.5% of previous stage

05 / Interpretation

What the numbers suggest

Relevance improved the handoff

Subject-specific pages give admissions staff the context needed to respond to a student’s actual program interest.

Visits alone are insufficient

The useful signal is the movement from relevant visits to qualified enquiries and then to application starts.

Content gaps become visible

Repeated questions about cost and eligibility indicate which page sections should be clarified before the next intake.

06 / Next actions

Where the team goes from here

  • 1Review completed applications and offers before making any enrollment claim.
  • 2Refresh program and scholarship information for the next intake.
  • 3Test a separate message for each priority subject area.

Measurement notes

How to read this case

Compare the six-month model with an equivalent previous window. A qualified enquiry means a student has selected a program and provided enough information for admissions follow-up; an application start is a started application, not an offer or enrollment.

All institutions, activity counts, rates, comparisons, and trends on this page are modelled for a planning scenario. They should be replaced with verified source data before being described as customer results.